Banned again!

This Windows Live ID account has been banned from this forum. While banned, you may browse the message boards and read messages contributed by other users. You may not create new messages, edit existing messages or delete old messages.

So, I'm crafting an intelligent response to MattyfromCincinatti on the thread "Tomato Grower Quits" and the bitches at MSNBC decide to ban me for the FOURTH time. What a bunch of crybabies!

I think there are some "anti" types that just want to continue to coddle the bigots there. The Bad Guys get to post 50 pages of bible spam, use racial slurs, ADMIT they're bigots and MSNBC does....nothing.

On the other hand, I call bullshit on the propoganda they post and I get bounced?

Phhhhhhhhhhhttt....I'll create a new screen name and be back on later today. You think those stupid fucks would realize by now they're wasting their time banning me, right? No...because they're stupid fucks!

BTW, MSNBC bans user accounts AND their respective IP addy's. BUT, the ban on the IP only lasts about 10 days. If you have a dynamic IP addy, no worries. If you have a static IP, you're hosed for about a week unless you can reset. Oh, and running an IPCONFIG from the CMD prompt won't work unless you have a dynamic IP. What has always worked for me is my wireless card since MSNBC would have to block the entire Verizon network to effect a ban on me that way. Bwaaaahahahahaha!

Here's what you see when an IP is banned (temporarily) -

Unfortunately, the message board recently experienced problems with people or automated programs posting unwanted messages.

For the time being, the message board is not accepting new messages.

Please continue to browse around and read messages contributed by other users.
What a crock of shit, huh? "problems with people" meaning...YOU posting "unwanted messages"? Unwanted by who? Some uptight bitch on a power trip who hasn't been fucked in a month of Sundays that makes $20K a year as a MSNBC Moderator? No wonder she loves the core group of haters on that board...they have a lot in common!

Anyway...no sense in wasting a good reply to the Mattster, so I'll post it here for future reference:

Matty: "Due to a lack of labor, cotton was SO expensive that we could no longer grow or process it..."


JMIII: And that is why we paid out over 19 BILLION in subsidies just for cotton over the past ten years (Source-Environmental Working Group & USDA). Also, consider that the top 10 percent of cotton producers receive 71 percent of all payments and the top one percent receives 22 percent. In spite of the fact that USDA regulations limit payments to any single recipient to $360,000 a year, loopholes allow some farmers to rake in millions a year. In 2003, the top 46 recipients of cotton subsidies, mostly farm corporations, each received over a millions dollars, while 80 percent of cotton producers received less than $3,000.
This skewed payment distribution harms our rural communities. Generous payments to large farms contribute to a hike in land prices and facilitate buy-outs of small farms. The result is consolidation of farms into increasingly larger farms that place small farms at a disadvantage. Small farmers can't expand or remain competitive and young farmers can't get into the business.

So...tell us how well the cotton industry turned out here in the US matty. Tell us how it's so good that we toss billions at our cotton farmers to keep them rolling in cash.

Explain that since you seem to know so much about agriculture..."kiddo".

Yeah...explain that, bitch!